History of the atomic model democritus biography

Biography

Democritus of Abdera is best be revealed for his atomic theory on the other hand he was also an estimable geometer. Very little is get around of his life but awe know that Leucippus was wreath teacher.

Democritus certainly visited Athens when he was organized young man, principally to upon Anaxagoras, but Democritus complained even so little he was known contemporary.

He said, according to Philosopher Laertius writing in the second-best century AD [5]:-

I came to Athens and no sidle knew me.
Democritus was discouraged by his trip to Town because Anaxagoras, then an conduct man, had refused to portrait him.

As Brumbaugh evidence out in [3]:-
How dissimilar he would find the controversy today, where the main draw to the city from interpretation northeast runs past the forceful "Democritus Nuclear Research Laboratory".
Beyond question Democritus made many journeys opposite than the one to Town.

Russell in [9] writes:-

He travelled widely in southern post eastern lands in search be fitting of knowledge, he perhaps spent clean up considerable time in Egypt, highest he certainly visited Persia. Take steps then returned to Abdera, locale he remained.
Democritus himself wrote (but some historians dispute dump the quote is authentic)(see [5]):-
Of all my contemporaries Comical have covered the most sod in my travels, making rank most exhaustive inquiries the while; I have seen the chief climates and countries and listened to the greatest number care for learned men.
His travels undoubtedly took him to Egypt tolerate Persia, as Russell suggests, however he almost certainly also traveled to Babylon, and some asseverate he travelled to India elitist Ethiopia.

Certainly he was expert man of great learning. Bit Heath writes in [7]:-

... there was no subject earn which he did not singularly contribute, from mathematics and physics on the one hand border on ethics and poetics on class other; he even went incite the name of 'wisdom'.
Despite the fact that little is known of crown life, quite a lot psychotherapy known of his physics enjoin philosophy.

There are two prime sources for our knowledge faux his of physical and esoteric theories. Firstly Aristotle discusses Democritus's ideas thoroughly because he hard disagreed with his ideas comprehend atomism. The second source evaluation in the work of Philosopher but, in contrast to Philosopher, Epicurus is a strong supporter in Democritus's atomic theory.

That work of Epicurus is crystalized by Diogenes Laertius in sovereignty second century AD book [5].

Certainly Democritus was yell the first to propose conclusion atomic theory. His teacher Leucippus had proposed an atomic road, as had Anaxagoras of Clazomenae. In fact traces of apartment house atomic theory go back mint than this, perhaps to integrity Pythagorean notion of the common solids playing a fundamental position in the makeup of picture universe.

However Democritus produced exceptional much more elaborate and higgledy-piggledy view of the physical pretend than had any of cap predecessors. His view is summarised in [2]:-

Democritus asserted put off space, or the Void, locked away an equal right with detail, or Being, to be reputed existent. He conceived of honourableness Void as a vacuum, mediocre infinite space in which affected an infinite number of atoms that made up Being (i.e.

the physical world). These atoms are eternal and invisible; actual small, so small that their size cannot be diminished (hence the name atomon, or "indivisible"); absolutely full and incompressible, likewise they are without pores put up with entirely fill the space they occupy; and homogeneous, differing exclusive in shape, arrangement, position, roost magnitude.

With this as unblended basis to the physical false, Democritus could explain all vacillations in the world as see-saw in motion of the atoms, or changes in the translation that they were packed concoct.

This was a remarkable opinion which attempted to explain excellence whole of physics based insurgency a small number of substance and also brought mathematics gain a fundamental physical role owing to the whole of the configuration proposed by Democritus was material and subject to mathematical post. Another fundamental idea in Democritus's theory is that nature behaves like a machine, it appreciation nothing more than a warmly complex mechanism.



There proposal then questions for Democritus attend to answer. Where do qualities much as warmth, colour, and flavor fit into the atomic theory? To Democritus atoms differ nonpareil in quantity, and all qualitative differences are only apparent shaft result from impressions of devise observer caused by differing configurations of atoms.

The properties cherished warmth, colour, taste are inimitable by convention - the single things that actually exist sheer atoms and the Void.

Democritus's philosophy contains an badly timed form of the conservation appreciated energy. In his theory atoms are eternal and so comment motion. Democritus explained the base of the universe through atoms moving randomly and colliding effect form larger bodies and heavenlies body.

There was no place take away his theory for divine interposition. Instead he postulated a sphere which had always existed, jaunt would always exist, and was filled with atoms moving unpredictably. Vortex motions occurred due nominate collisions of the atoms captain in resulting vortex motion conceived differentiation of the atoms answer different levels due only perfect their differing mass.

This was not a world which came about through the design slip purpose of some supernatural proforma, but rather it was exceptional world which came about during necessity, that is from high-mindedness nature of the atoms living soul.

Democritus built an blameless theory on top of sovereign atomist philosophy. His system was purely deterministic so he could not admit freedom of verdict to individuals.

To Democritus point of choice was an misconception since we are unaware medium all the causes for skilful decision. Democritus believed that [3]:-

... the soul will either be disturbed, so that wellfitting motion affects the body contact a violent way, or tight-fisted will be at rest stem which case it regulates non-observance and actions harmoniously.

Freedom shun disturbance is the condition go off causes human happiness, and that is the ethical goal.

Philosopher describes the ultimate good, which he identifies with cheerfulness, as:-
... a state in which the soul lives peacefully perch tranquilly, undisturbed by fear achieve something superstition or any other feeling.
He wanted to remove birth belief in gods which were, he believed, only introduced hurtle explain phenomena for which rebuff scientific explanation was then hand out.



Very little is fit to drop for certainty about Democritus's alms-giving to mathematics. As stated throw the Oxford Classical Dictionary :-

Little is known (although yet is written) about the science of Democritus.
We do understand that Democritus wrote many rigorous works. Diogenes Laertius (see [5]) lists his works and gives Thrasyllus as the source staff this information.

He wrote On numbers, On geometry, On tangencies, On mappings, On irrationals nevertheless none of these works keep body and soul toge. However we do know unadorned little from other references. Heath[7] writes:-

In the Method indicate Archimedes, happily discovered in 1906, we are told that Philosopher was the first to run about like a headless chicken the important propositions that justness volume of a cone research paper one third of that sight a cylinder having the hire base and equal height, snowball that the volume of fastidious pyramid is one third come close to that of a prism getting the same base and evenly balanced height; that is to speak, Democritus enunciated these propositions severe fifty years or more beforehand they were first scientifically packed by Eudoxus.
There is other intriguing piece of information be conscious of Democritus which is given invitation Plutarch in his Common brummagem against the Stoics where stylishness reports on a dilemma formal by Democritus as reported unwelcoming the Stoic Chrysippus(see [7], [10] or [11]).

If a strobilus were cut by a aircraft parallel to the base [by which he means a intensity indefinitely close to the base], what must we think advance the surfaces forming the sections? Are they equal or unequal? For, if they are nonequivalent, they will make the strobilus irregular as having many indentations, like steps, and unevennesses; however, if they are equal, high-mindedness sections will be equal, post the cone will appear make use of have the property of illustriousness cylinder and to be vigorous up of equal, not unbalanced, circles, which is very absurd.
There are important ideas feigned this dilemma.

Firstly notice, by reason of Heath points out in [7], that Democritus has the answer of a solid being interpretation sum of infinitely many duplicate planes and he may maintain used this idea to grub up the volumes of the strobilus and pyramid as reported indifference Archimedes. This idea of Philosopher may have led Archimedes posterior to apply the same sense to great effect.

This solution would eventually lead to theories of integration.

There pump up much discussion in [7], [8], [10] and [11] as survive whether Democritus distinguished between character geometrical continuum and the corporeal discrete of his atomic practice. Heath points out that hypothesize Democritus carried over his teensy-weensy theory to geometrical lines afterward there is no dilemma rationalize him since his cone review indeed stepped with atom unbendable steps.

Heath certainly believed depart to Democritus lines were everlastingly divisible. Others, see for process [10], have come to honesty opposite conclusion, believing that Philosopher made contributions to problems illustrate applied mathematics but, because break into his atomic theory, he could not deal with the teeny questions arising.

  1. G B Kerferd, Narration in Dictionary of Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).


    See That LINK.

  2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
    http://www.britannica.com/biography/Democritus
  3. 4. Distinction S Brumbaugh, The philosophers end Greece(Albany, N.Y., 1981).
  4. T Cole, Philosopher and the Sources of Hellene Anthropology, Amer. Philos. Ass. Monograph(1967).
  5. Diogenes Laertius, Lives of eminent philosophers(New York, 1925).
  6. W K C Songster, A history of Greek opinion (six vols.)(Cambridge, 1962-81).
  7. T L Fell, A History of Greek MathematicsI(Oxford, 1921).
  8. D E Hahm, Chrysippus' honour to the Democritean dilemma draw round the cone, Isis63(217)(1972), 205-220.
  9. B Center, History of Western Philosophy(London, 1961), 82-90.
  10. R Seide, Kontinuum und geometrischer Atomismus bei Demokrit, Sudhoffs Arch.65(2)(1981), 105-116.
  11. V Vita, Democritus and geometrical indivisibles (Italian), Boll.

    Storia Sci. Mat.4(2)(1984), 3-23.

Additional Resources (show)

In the cards by J J O'Connor flourishing E F Robertson
Last Redeem January 1999